PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCD vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCD vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. (SCD) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCD achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SCD has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 13.16%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.81% annualized return.


SCD

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.18%
YTD
9.35%
6M
9.87%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
13.16%

QBDSX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.25%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
0.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCD vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCD
LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc.
9.35%-3.80%33.95%28.09%-10.04%46.29%-14.89%59.16%-15.56%14.59%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.25%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCD and QBDSX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCD vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCD
SCD Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCD vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. (SCD) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCDQBDSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

0.83

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.10

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

0.65

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.32

1.83

-0.51

SCD vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCD Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCD and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCDQBDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.19

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.15

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.16

+0.30

Drawdowns

SCD vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCD drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCD and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCDQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-18.38%

-44.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-3.09%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-3.76%

-18.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.41%

-7.40%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.76%

-18.38%

-42.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-7.83%

+7.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-6.85%

-3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

1.10%

+3.86%

Volatility

SCD vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. (SCD) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.68%. This indicates that SCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCDQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

0.68%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

2.39%

+6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

3.59%

+10.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

4.32%

+15.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

5.25%

+18.09%

Dividends

SCD vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

SCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, more than QBDSX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.46%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%
SCD
LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc.
9.25%9.55%7.88%8.56%12.96%10.26%10.21%7.98%11.61%8.89%9.33%9.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCD and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCD has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to QBDSX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCD dropped -62.40% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

QBDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCD and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer