SCCR vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SCCR (Schwab Core Bond ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCCR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCCR returned 5.53% vs 5.08% for FBND. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCCR charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.

Performance

SCCR vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCR achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.61% return.

SCCR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.59%
• 1Y: 5.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBND

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 5.08%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 0.86%
• 10Y*: 2.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCR vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	0.44%	6.66%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.61%	5.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCR and FBND is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.93

The correlation between SCCR and FBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCCR vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCCR	FBND
Financial Services	13.2%	0.2%
Industrials	6.9%	71.4%
Technology	3.4%	-
Healthcare	3.1%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Communication Services	2.3%	-
Energy	1.9%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.7%	27.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	-

Return for Risk

SCCR vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCR

SCCR Risk / Return Rank: 42
SCCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SCCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SCCR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SCCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SCCR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 38
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCR vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCCR	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.34	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	1.97	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	1.91	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	5.77	+0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCCR vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCR and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCCR	FBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.34	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	0.45	+0.78

Drawdowns

SCCR vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCR drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCR and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCR	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-17.25%	+14.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-2.66%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-1.32%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-3.35%	+2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.88%	+0.05%

Volatility

SCCR vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) have volatilities of 1.28% and 1.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCCR	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	1.26%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	2.73%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75%	3.86%	-0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.38%	5.92%	-1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.38%	6.09%	-1.71%

SCCR vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCR has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCCR vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

SCCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than FBND's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.70%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	4.63%	3.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCCR and FBND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SCCR and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCCR or FBND?

SCCR has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to FBND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCR dropped -2.81% vs FBND's -17.25%.

Which ETF is better, SCCR or FBND?

On 1-year performance, SCCR leads with 5.53% vs 5.08% for FBND. On fees, SCCR is cheaper at 0.16% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCCR or FBND?

Over the 1-year period, SCCR has performed better with a 5.53% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCCR or FBND?

SCCR is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCCR or FBND?

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.63% for SCCR.

What is the main difference between SCCR and FBND?

SCCR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for SCCR and 0.36% for FBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.