SCCR vs. BBAG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCCR (Schwab Core Bond ETF) and BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. SCCR is actively managed, while BBAG is passively managed. Over the past year, SCCR returned 5.16% vs 4.36% for BBAG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCCR charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BBAG.

Performance

SCCR vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCR achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than BBAG's 0.46% return.

SCCR

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBAG

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: -0.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCR vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	0.52%	7.00%
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.46%	6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCR and BBAG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.93

The correlation between SCCR and BBAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCCR vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCR

SCCR Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SCCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCCR Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SCCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SCCR Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BBAG

BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 33
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCR vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCCR	BBAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.13	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	1.69	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.20	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.58	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.22	4.42	+0.81

SCCR vs. BBAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the BBAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCR and BBAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCCR vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCR drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCR and BBAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCR	BBAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-18.73%	+15.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-2.78%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-2.56%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.79%	-6.20%	+5.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	0.99%	0.00%

Volatility

SCCR vs. BBAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) is 1.06%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that SCCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCCR	BBAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	1.13%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	2.90%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	3.89%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.37%	5.93%	-1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.37%	5.79%	-1.42%

SCCR vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCR has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCCR vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison

SCCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than BBAG's 4.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.35%	4.29%	4.25%	3.60%	2.23%	1.44%	2.26%	2.92%	0.16%
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	4.62%	3.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCCR and BBAG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SCCR and BBAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCCR or BBAG?

BBAG has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to SCCR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCR dropped -2.81% vs BBAG's -18.73%.

Which ETF is better, SCCR or BBAG?

On 1-year performance, SCCR leads with 5.16% vs 4.36% for BBAG. On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCCR or BBAG?

Over the 1-year period, SCCR has performed better with a 5.16% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCCR or BBAG?

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for SCCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCCR or BBAG?

SCCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 4.35% for BBAG.

What is the main difference between SCCR and BBAG?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for SCCR and 0.03% for BBAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.