PortfoliosLab logo
BBAG vs. BND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BBAG and BND is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BBAG vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BBAG:

1.09

BND:

1.10

Sortino Ratio

BBAG:

1.57

BND:

1.60

Omega Ratio

BBAG:

1.19

BND:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

BBAG:

0.46

BND:

0.47

Martin Ratio

BBAG:

2.69

BND:

2.79

Ulcer Index

BBAG:

2.20%

BND:

2.11%

Daily Std Dev

BBAG:

5.40%

BND:

5.32%

Max Drawdown

BBAG:

-18.86%

BND:

-18.84%

Current Drawdown

BBAG:

-7.44%

BND:

-7.09%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBAG having a 2.52% return and BND slightly lower at 2.49%.


BBAG

YTD

2.52%

1M

-0.36%

6M

0.88%

1Y

5.44%

3Y*

1.40%

5Y*

-1.11%

10Y*

N/A

BND

YTD

2.49%

1M

-0.40%

6M

0.77%

1Y

5.44%

3Y*

1.52%

5Y*

-1.00%

10Y*

1.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BBAG vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBAG and BND have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BBAG vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBAG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BBAG is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BBAG is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BBAG is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BBAG is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BBAG is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BBAG is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BND is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BND is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BND is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BND is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BND is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BND is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BBAG vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BBAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAG and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BBAG vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

BBAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than BND's 3.74% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BBAG
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.25%4.25%3.60%2.23%1.44%2.11%2.91%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.74%3.67%3.09%2.60%1.97%2.22%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%2.79%

Drawdowns

BBAG vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAG drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAG and BND.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BBAG vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) is 1.39%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that BBAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...