SCCPX vs. BUSIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCCPX (Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund) and BUSIX (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SCCPX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Sterling Capital, while BUSIX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Sterling Capital. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCCPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for BUSIX.

Performance

SCCPX vs. BUSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCCPX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: 3.47%
• 5Y*: -2.58%
• 10Y*: 22.01%

BUSIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCPX vs. BUSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund	0.53%	6.37%	-1.68%	9.20%	-23.65%	-0.01%	625.95%	10.78%	-0.95%	4.22%
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund	0.83%	4.93%	5.87%	5.09%	0.32%	0.31%	2.16%	3.27%	1.66%	1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCPX and BUSIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.34

The correlation between SCCPX and BUSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SCCPX vs. BUSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCPX

SCCPX Risk / Return Rank: 10
SCCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SCCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SCCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
SCCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SCCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BUSIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCPX vs. BUSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCCPX	BUSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.65	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCPX	BUSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.39%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCCPX	BUSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.59%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.22%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	182.29%	—	—

SCCPX vs. BUSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BUSIX's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCCPX vs. BUSIX - Dividend Comparison

SCCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than BUSIX's 3.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund	3.19%	4.29%	4.65%	3.48%	1.87%	1.24%	1.72%	2.60%	2.05%	1.57%	1.74%	1.36%
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund	5.12%	4.99%	4.84%	3.54%	4.11%	13.93%	88.30%	3.01%	3.31%	3.76%	3.41%	3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCCPX and BUSIX in my portfolio?

SCCPX and BUSIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.