PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCCPX vs. BIBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCCPX vs. BIBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) and Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCPX achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than BIBTX's -0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SCCPX has outperformed BIBTX with an annualized return of 21.39%, while BIBTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.


SCCPX

1D
0.31%
1M
-3.85%
6M
-3.35%
YTD
-3.07%
1Y
-0.76%
3Y*
2.21%
5Y*
-3.50%
10Y*
21.39%
ALL TIME*
15.83%

BIBTX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.29%
6M
-1.15%
YTD
-0.80%
1Y
1.67%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
1.75%
ALL TIME*
4.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SCCPX vs. BIBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCCPX
Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund
-3.07%6.37%-1.68%9.20%-23.65%-0.01%625.95%10.78%-0.95%4.22%
BIBTX
Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund
-0.80%6.93%2.17%5.53%-13.24%-1.21%9.24%9.29%-0.34%4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCPX and BIBTX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.88

The correlation between SCCPX and BIBTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCCPX vs. BIBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCCPX
SCCPX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SCCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBTX
BIBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BIBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCCPX vs. BIBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) and Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCCPXBIBTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.13

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

0.95

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.22

2.29

-2.07

SCCPX vs. BIBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the BIBTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCPX and BIBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCCPX vs. BIBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCPX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, which is greater than BIBTX's maximum drawdown of -18.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCPX and BIBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCCPXBIBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-18.28%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.86%

-3.05%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.46%

-5.38%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.84%

-18.28%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

-18.28%

-13.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.49%

-2.61%

-13.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-2.38%

-4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

1.27%

+1.20%

Volatility

SCCPX vs. BIBTX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) at 1.13%. This indicates that SCCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCCPXBIBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.13%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.74%

3.12%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.47%

3.91%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

5.83%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

182.22%

4.89%

+177.33%

SCCPX vs. BIBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCCPX and BIBTX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

SCCPX vs. BIBTX - Dividend Comparison

SCCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than BIBTX's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIBTX
Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund
4.02%4.09%4.11%3.17%2.82%3.15%4.03%3.12%3.22%3.00%3.27%3.55%
SCCPX
Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund
4.90%4.99%4.84%3.54%4.11%13.93%88.30%3.01%3.31%3.76%3.41%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCCPX and BIBTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCCPX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to BIBTX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCPX dropped -31.88% vs BIBTX's -18.28%.

BIBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCCPX and BIBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer