BUSIX vs. SADIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BUSIX (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund) and SADIX (Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUSIX charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for SADIX.

Performance

BUSIX vs. SADIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund (SADIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BUSIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SADIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.38%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.52%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 2.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUSIX vs. SADIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund	0.83%	4.93%	5.87%	5.09%	0.32%	0.31%	2.16%	3.27%	1.66%	1.37%
SADIX Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund	1.38%	5.28%	6.34%	6.27%	-0.56%	0.22%	2.73%	3.82%	1.68%	1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BUSIX and SADIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between BUSIX and SADIX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BUSIX vs. SADIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUSIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SADIX

SADIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
SADIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SADIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SADIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SADIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SADIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUSIX vs. SADIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund (SADIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUSIX	SADIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	9.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	3.07	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	13.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	51.49	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BUSIX	SADIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.34%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.23%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.37%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUSIX	SADIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.45%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.41%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.34%	—

BUSIX vs. SADIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUSIX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SADIX's 0.26% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BUSIX vs. SADIX - Dividend Comparison

BUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than SADIX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund	3.19%	4.29%	4.65%	3.48%	1.87%	1.24%	1.72%	2.60%	2.05%	1.57%	1.74%	1.36%
SADIX Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund	4.30%	4.45%	4.39%	2.99%	1.44%	0.80%	1.85%	2.44%	2.03%	1.49%	1.36%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUSIX and SADIX in my portfolio?

BUSIX and SADIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.