SCCPX vs. BBSGX
SCCPX (Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund) and BBSGX (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SCCPX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Sterling Capital, while BBSGX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Sterling Capital. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCCPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for BBSGX.
Performance
SCCPX vs. BBSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCCPX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- -2.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.12%
BBSGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCCPX vs. BBSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | 1.12% | 6.37% | -1.68% | 9.20% | -23.65% | -0.01% | 625.95% | 10.78% | -0.95% | 4.22% |
BBSGX Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund | -0.10% | 5.68% | 5.56% | 5.38% | -3.18% | -0.10% | 4.24% | 4.72% | 1.34% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCCPX and BBSGX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCCPX and BBSGX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCCPX vs. BBSGX — Risk / Return Rank
SCCPX
BBSGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCCPX vs. BBSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund (BBSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCCPX | BBSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCCPX vs. BBSGX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCCPX | BBSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.87% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility
SCCPX vs. BBSGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCCPX | BBSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.21% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.18% | — | — |
SCCPX vs. BBSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCCPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSGX's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCCPX vs. BBSGX - Dividend Comparison
SCCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than BBSGX's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSGX Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.48% | 4.66% | 4.66% | 3.12% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 2.53% | 2.85% | 2.86% | 2.70% | 2.73% | 3.10% |
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | 5.09% | 4.99% | 4.84% | 3.54% | 4.11% | 13.93% | 88.30% | 3.01% | 3.31% | 3.76% | 3.41% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCCPX and BBSGX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SCCPX and BBSGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer