PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCAP vs. BNDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCAP vs. BNDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) and Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCAP achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than BNDS's 4.23% return.


SCAP

1D
-0.95%
1M
2.95%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.93%
1Y
27.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNDS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.17%
YTD
4.23%
6M
4.33%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCAP vs. BNDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCAP and BNDS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

0.59

The correlation between SCAP and BNDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCAP vs. BNDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCAP
SCAP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDS
BNDS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BNDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCAP vs. BNDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) and Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCAPBNDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.78

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

3.75

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

17.29

-9.46

SCAP vs. BNDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the BNDS Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCAP and BNDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCAPBNDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

3.65

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.75

-0.76

Drawdowns

SCAP vs. BNDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCAP drawdown since its inception was -24.13%, which is greater than BNDS's maximum drawdown of -6.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCAP and BNDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCAPBNDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.13%

-6.96%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-3.45%

-8.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.34%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-0.82%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

0.75%

+2.72%

Volatility

SCAP vs. BNDS - Volatility Comparison

Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) at 0.86%. This indicates that SCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCAPBNDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

0.86%

+3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

2.74%

+9.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

3.55%

+12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.67%

5.29%

+13.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.67%

5.29%

+13.38%

SCAP vs. BNDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCAP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDS's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCAP vs. BNDS - Dividend Comparison

SCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, less than BNDS's 7.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BNDS
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
7.97%7.98%0.00%0.00%
SCAP
Infracap Small Cap Income ETF
6.97%6.71%6.89%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCAP and BNDS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCAP has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to BNDS (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCAP dropped -24.13% vs BNDS's -6.96%.

On 1-year performance, SCAP leads with 27.11% vs 12.86% for BNDS. On fees, SCAP is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, BNDS has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCAP has performed better with a 27.11% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCAP is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BNDS.

BNDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.97%, compared with 6.97% for SCAP.

SCAP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BNDS is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SCAP and 0.81% for BNDS.

BNDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCAP and BNDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer