SCAP vs. XITK
SCAP (Infracap Small Cap Income ETF) and XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCAP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by InfraCap, while XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index. SCAP is actively managed, while XITK is passively managed. Over the past year, SCAP returned 21.17% vs 1.26% for XITK. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SCAP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for XITK.
Performance
SCAP vs. XITK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCAP achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than XITK's 3.17% return.
SCAP
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
XITK
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 1.26%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- -3.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $115.86K | $101.48K | $91.47K | |
| $94.40K | $185.95K | $342.96K |
SCAP vs. XITK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCAP Infracap Small Cap Income ETF | 9.35% | 11.85% | 16.39% | 6.37% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 3.17% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 6.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCAP and XITK is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SCAP and XITK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCAP vs. XITK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCAP
XITK
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
SCAP
XITK
Financial Services
SCAP
XITK
Consumer Cyclical
SCAP
XITK
Technology
SCAP
XITK
Energy
SCAP
XITK
-
Basic Materials
SCAP
XITK
-
Healthcare
SCAP
XITK
Real Estate
SCAP
XITK
Communication Services
SCAP
XITK
Consumer Defensive
SCAP
XITK
-
Utilities
SCAP
XITK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCAP vs. XITK — Risk / Return Rank
SCAP
XITK
SCAP vs. XITK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) and SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCAP | XITK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.02 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.05 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | -0.11 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCAP vs. XITK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCAP drawdown since its inception was -24.13%, smaller than the maximum XITK drawdown of -65.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCAP and XITK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCAP | XITK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.13% | -65.56% | +41.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -28.03% | +16.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -29.65% | +25.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -22.17% | +18.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 12.69% | -9.15% |
Volatility
SCAP vs. XITK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) is 4.87%, while SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that SCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XITK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCAP | XITK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 9.22% | -4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 25.08% | -12.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.73% | 29.28% | -12.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 33.07% | -14.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 29.72% | -11.06% |
SCAP vs. XITK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCAP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XITK's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCAP vs. XITK - Dividend Comparison
SCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, while XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCAP Infracap Small Cap Income ETF | 7.35% | 6.71% | 6.89% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCAP and XITK have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XITK has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to SCAP (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCAP dropped -24.13% vs XITK's -65.56%.
On 1-year performance, SCAP leads with 21.17% vs 1.26% for XITK. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SCAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCAP has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 1.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SCAP.
SCAP has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
SCAP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XITK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SCAP and 0.45% for XITK.
SCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCAP and XITK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer