SCA vs. SFYI

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

SCA (GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF) and SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for SFYI.

Performance

SCA vs. SFYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCA

• 1D: 6.52%
• 1M: -10.69%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SFYI

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCA vs. SFYI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF	-2.93%
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF	-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SCA and SFYI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026	0.52

Return for Risk

SCA vs. SFYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

SCA vs. SFYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCA drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than SFYI's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCA and SFYI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCA	SFYI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.40%	-3.25%	-24.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.66%	-1.83%	-20.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.13%	-1.31%	-11.82%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCA	SFYI	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.40%	14.68%	+34.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.40%	14.68%	+34.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.40%	14.68%	+34.72%

SCA vs. SFYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYI's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCA vs. SFYI - Dividend Comparison

SCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, while SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF	8.48%
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCA and SFYI in my portfolio?

SCA and SFYI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCA or SFYI?

On fees, SFYI is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCA or SFYI?

SFYI is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCA or SFYI?

SCA has the higher dividend yield at 8.48%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.

What is the main difference between SCA and SFYI?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SCA and 0.73% for SFYI.