PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0T.DE achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0T.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 5.80%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.


SC0T.DE

1D
2.93%
1M
0.25%
YTD
-3.57%
6M
-2.50%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
2.80%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
5.80%

XDWH.DE

1D
2.85%
1M
3.42%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0T.DE
Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF
-3.57%8.45%6.96%5.35%-7.56%25.20%-1.18%32.22%-1.43%4.65%
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-1.98%2.21%7.44%0.04%-0.07%30.55%2.69%27.24%5.96%5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0T.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016

0.76

The correlation between SC0T.DE and XDWH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0T.DE
SC0T.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SC0T.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0T.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0T.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0T.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0T.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.DE
XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0T.DEXDWH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.13

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

0.93

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

2.28

-1.72

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0T.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0T.DE and XDWH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0T.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

0.70

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.41

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.51

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.55

+0.08

Drawdowns

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0T.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.52%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0T.DE and XDWH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0T.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.52%

-26.08%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-10.32%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-21.12%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.67%

-21.12%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.52%

-26.08%

-0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.59%

-8.51%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-4.82%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

4.20%

+1.38%

Volatility

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that SC0T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0T.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

4.81%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

9.51%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

13.69%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

13.43%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

14.69%

+0.70%

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0T.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0T.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0T.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0T.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0T.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

SC0T.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Health Care, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0T.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0T.DE and XDWH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer