SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE
SC0C.DE (Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - SC0C.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SC0C.DE returned 9.07%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SC0C.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SC0C.DE achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0C.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 9.07%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
SC0C.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC0C.DE Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF | 7.46% | 20.66% | 8.31% | 15.54% | -10.52% | 24.51% | -1.98% | 28.32% | -11.21% | 10.84% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SC0C.DE and AMED.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SC0C.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SC0C.DE
AMED.DE
SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SC0C.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.49 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 9.40 | -2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SC0C.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.74 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.65 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.57 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.47 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0C.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.89%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0C.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SC0C.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.89% | -38.35% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -10.56% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -14.07% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.52% | -24.06% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.89% | -38.35% | +2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -0.17% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -6.69% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.81% | -0.32% |
Volatility
SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) is 4.41%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that SC0C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SC0C.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 5.61% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 12.64% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 15.19% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 15.87% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.00% | -1.01% |
SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SC0C.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SC0C.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SC0C.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SC0C.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SC0C.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SC0C.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
SC0C.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SC0C.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for SC0C.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer