PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0C.DE vs. MASKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SC0C.DE is traded in EUR, while MASKX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MASKX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0C.DE achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than MASKX's 19.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0C.DE has underperformed MASKX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while MASKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


SC0C.DE

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.59%
YTD
6.84%
6M
9.88%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.05%

MASKX

1D
1.01%
1M
5.49%
YTD
19.78%
6M
17.72%
1Y
37.94%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0C.DE
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
6.84%20.66%8.31%15.54%-10.52%24.51%-1.98%28.32%-11.21%10.84%
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund
19.78%-0.62%18.70%13.48%-15.46%23.11%10.10%28.37%-6.85%0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0C.DE and MASKX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2009

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0C.DE
SC0C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SC0C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

MASKX
MASKX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MASKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MASKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0C.DEMASKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

4.70

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

15.10

-8.62

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the MASKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0C.DE and MASKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0C.DEMASKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.20

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.33

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.46

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.38

+0.23

Drawdowns

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0C.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.89%, smaller than the maximum MASKX drawdown of -53.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0C.DE and MASKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0C.DEMASKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.89%

-53.71%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.75%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-30.92%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-30.92%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.89%

-42.08%

+6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-0.28%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-10.97%

+5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.72%

-0.24%

Volatility

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) have volatilities of 4.87% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0C.DEMASKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

5.10%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

12.89%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

18.72%

-5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

22.60%

-8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

23.90%

-7.91%

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0C.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MASKX's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0C.DE vs. MASKX - Dividend Comparison

SC0C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MASKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund
2.64%3.13%4.81%2.92%1.70%7.64%1.42%3.43%4.26%3.15%4.60%3.63%
SC0C.DE
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0C.DE and MASKX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0C.DE and MASKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer