SBUX vs. LI
SBUX (Starbucks Corporation) and LI (Li Auto Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — SBUX in Restaurants, LI in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, SBUX returned 0.57%/yr vs -12.64%/yr for LI. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBUX vs. LI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBUX achieves a 23.87% return, which is significantly higher than LI's -15.53% return.
SBUX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 23.87%
- 6M
- 22.22%
- 1Y
- 13.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
LI
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -25.79%
- YTD
- -15.53%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- 1Y
- -48.49%
- 3Y*
- -23.14%
- 5Y*
- -12.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SBUX vs. LI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 23.87% | -5.26% | -2.48% | -1.19% | -13.18% | 11.15% | 39.59% |
LI Li Auto Inc. | -15.53% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 11.34% | 86.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBUX and LI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
SBUX:
$117.80B
LI:
$14.50B
SBUX:
$1.31
LI:
-CN¥1.74
SBUX:
3.06
LI:
0.92
SBUX:
$38.46B
LI:
CN¥108.98B
SBUX:
$12.24B
LI:
CN¥17.42B
SBUX:
$5.14B
LI:
-CN¥2.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBUX vs. LI — Risk / Return Rank
SBUX
LI
SBUX vs. LI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBUX | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.78 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | -0.89 | +1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | -1.35 | +2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBUX vs. LI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBUX drawdown since its inception was -81.91%, which is greater than LI's maximum drawdown of -70.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUX and LI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBUX | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.91% | -70.65% | -11.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.53% | -56.95% | +38.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.97% | -70.65% | +38.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.68% | -70.65% | +26.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.15% | -69.35% | +61.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -39.93% | +23.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 37.41% | -29.04% |
Volatility
SBUX vs. LI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is 7.26%, while Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that SBUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBUX | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 15.12% | -7.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.10% | 28.81% | -7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.48% | 40.30% | -11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 63.52% | -31.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 68.32% | -38.85% |
Dividends
SBUX vs. LI - Dividend Comparison
SBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while LI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2.40% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.25% | 2.02% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.83% | 1.53% | 1.13% |
Financials
SBUX vs. LI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Starbucks Corporation and Li Auto Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBUX vs. LI - Profitability Comparison
SBUX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.32B and revenue of 9.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.3%.
LI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.
SBUX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported an operating income of 828.10M and revenue of 9.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
LI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.
SBUX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a net income of 510.90M and revenue of 9.53B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
LI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBUX and LI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to SBUX (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBUX dropped -81.91% vs LI's -70.65%.
SBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBUX and LI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer