SBTU vs. NTSD
SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBTU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
SBTU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SBTU
- 1D
- -12.70%
- 1M
- -39.34%
- YTD
- -78.65%
- 6M
- -80.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -66.19% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBTU and NTSD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBTU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBTU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBTU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.04% | -5.58% | -87.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.04% | -2.97% | -90.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -1.09% | -68.83% |
Volatility
SBTU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBTU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 160.40% | 25.11% | +135.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.40% | 25.11% | +135.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 160.40% | 25.11% | +135.29% |
SBTU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBTU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBTU nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBTU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SBTU and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for SBTU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer