PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTK vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTK vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF (MSTK) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSTK

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.99%
YTD
5.30%
6M
5.17%
1Y
12.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTK vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSTK and OMAH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTK vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTK

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTK vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF (MSTK) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSTK vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTKOMAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

Drawdowns

MSTK vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTKOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

Volatility

MSTK vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTKOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

MSTK vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTK vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

MSTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.03%, more than OMAH's 15.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSTK and OMAH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTK.

MSTK has the higher dividend yield at 49.03%, compared with 15.33% for OMAH.

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTK and 0.95% for OMAH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTK and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer