PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBS vs. ACMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBS vs. ACMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) and ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBS achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly lower than ACMR's 138.15% return.


SBS

1D
-0.18%
1M
-6.98%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.60%
1Y
38.40%
3Y*
40.12%
5Y*
32.68%
10Y*
16.43%

ACMR

1D
2.45%
1M
45.10%
YTD
138.15%
6M
141.95%
1Y
265.21%
3Y*
104.60%
5Y*
25.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBS vs. ACMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
15.28%80.60%-4.21%46.89%48.42%-13.79%-40.98%91.22%-20.37%13.83%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
138.15%161.26%-22.72%153.44%-72.87%4.95%340.38%69.58%107.24%-35.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SBS and ACMR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2017

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBS:

$19.24B

ACMR:

$6.55B

EPS

SBS:

R$2.48

ACMR:

$1.33

PE Ratio

SBS:

11.24

ACMR:

70.83

PEG Ratio

SBS:

0.22

ACMR:

2.48

PS Ratio

SBS:

2.48

ACMR:

6.71

PB Ratio

SBS:

2.27

ACMR:

4.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBS:

R$38.70B

ACMR:

$960.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBS:

R$13.96B

ACMR:

$424.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

SBS:

R$14.87B

ACMR:

$162.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBS vs. ACMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBS
SBS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ACMR
ACMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ACMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ACMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBS vs. ACMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) and ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBSACMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.45

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

5.76

-4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

14.73

-10.08

SBS vs. ACMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the ACMR Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBS and ACMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBS vs. ACMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBS drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, smaller than the maximum ACMR drawdown of -87.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBS and ACMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBSACMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.49%

-87.23%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.88%

-46.34%

+21.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.88%

-58.42%

+33.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-84.81%

+54.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.90%

0.00%

-22.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-39.55%

+13.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.28%

18.11%

-9.83%

Volatility

SBS vs. ACMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is 8.92%, while ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) has a volatility of 33.26%. This indicates that SBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBSACMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

33.26%

-24.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.61%

59.35%

-34.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.86%

77.68%

-43.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

80.77%

-43.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.51%

83.99%

-40.48%

Dividends

SBS vs. ACMR - Dividend Comparison

SBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, while ACMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
2.33%4.68%1.96%1.66%1.88%0.97%2.93%1.99%3.86%2.76%0.65%1.91%

Financials

SBS vs. ACMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP and ACM Research, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
9.78B
231.26M
(SBS) Total Revenue
(ACMR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SBS values in BRL, ACMR values in USD

SBS vs. ACMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP and ACM Research, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
38.8%
46.4%
Portfolio components
SBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported a gross profit of 3.79B and revenue of 9.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.

ACMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a gross profit of 107.24M and revenue of 231.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

SBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported an operating income of 3.33B and revenue of 9.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.

ACMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.18M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

SBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported a net income of 1.72B and revenue of 9.78B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.

ACMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a net income of 17.31M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SBS and ACMR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACMR has higher volatility (33.26%) compared to SBS (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBS dropped -76.49% vs ACMR's -87.23%.

ACMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBS and ACMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer