SBMAX vs. WAMFX
SBMAX (ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund) and WAMFX (Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SBMAX returned 8.47%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for WAMFX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SBMAX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WAMFX.
Performance
SBMAX vs. WAMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBMAX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than WAMFX's 2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SBMAX has underperformed WAMFX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while WAMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.
SBMAX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
WAMFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
SBMAX vs. WAMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBMAX ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund | 3.76% | 4.21% | 9.79% | 13.51% | -25.19% | 28.37% | 16.25% | 32.77% | -12.92% | 12.69% |
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund | 2.40% | 4.82% | 10.39% | 13.90% | -10.87% | 24.85% | 9.56% | 36.98% | -3.59% | 16.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBMAX and WAMFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SBMAX and WAMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBMAX vs. WAMFX — Risk / Return Rank
SBMAX
WAMFX
SBMAX vs. WAMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX) and Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBMAX | WAMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.01 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | 2.92 | -0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBMAX vs. WAMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBMAX drawdown since its inception was -52.41%, which is greater than WAMFX's maximum drawdown of -36.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBMAX and WAMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBMAX | WAMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.41% | -36.81% | -15.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -8.38% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -17.51% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.55% | -20.82% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.88% | -36.81% | -3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -2.17% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -3.93% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.91% | +0.55% |
Volatility
SBMAX vs. WAMFX - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) at 3.26%. This indicates that SBMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBMAX | WAMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.26% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 8.36% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 12.04% | +2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 15.81% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.49% | +2.77% |
SBMAX vs. WAMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBMAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMFX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBMAX vs. WAMFX - Dividend Comparison
SBMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than WAMFX's 7.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBMAX ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund | 8.60% | 8.92% | 8.73% | 1.83% | 4.96% | 12.79% | 7.27% | 7.78% | 4.52% | 6.52% | 1.70% | 5.00% |
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund | 7.06% | 7.23% | 3.49% | 4.84% | 5.55% | 4.82% | 3.87% | 12.83% | 7.08% | 0.45% | 5.06% | 5.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBMAX and WAMFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBMAX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to WAMFX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBMAX dropped -52.41% vs WAMFX's -36.81%.
WAMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBMAX and WAMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer