SBMAX vs. FRSGX
SBMAX (ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund) and FRSGX (Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SBMAX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FRSGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, SBMAX returned 8.47%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for FRSGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SBMAX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FRSGX.
Performance
SBMAX vs. FRSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBMAX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than FRSGX's 6.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SBMAX has underperformed FRSGX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while FRSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.
SBMAX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
FRSGX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
SBMAX vs. FRSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBMAX ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund | 3.76% | 4.21% | 9.79% | 13.51% | -25.19% | 28.37% | 16.25% | 32.77% | -12.92% | 12.69% |
FRSGX Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | 6.91% | 2.83% | 11.36% | 27.20% | -33.84% | 50.07% | 56.09% | 31.98% | -4.94% | 21.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBMAX and FRSGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 1998 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SBMAX and FRSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBMAX vs. FRSGX — Risk / Return Rank
SBMAX
FRSGX
SBMAX vs. FRSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX) and Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBMAX | FRSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.10 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.73 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | 2.25 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBMAX vs. FRSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBMAX drawdown since its inception was -52.41%, smaller than the maximum FRSGX drawdown of -69.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBMAX and FRSGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBMAX | FRSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.41% | -69.07% | +16.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -12.39% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -25.77% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.55% | -39.25% | +7.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.88% | -39.25% | -0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -0.57% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -18.67% | +9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 4.04% | -0.58% |
Volatility
SBMAX vs. FRSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX) is 3.63%, while Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that SBMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBMAX | FRSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 5.87% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 13.27% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 16.66% | -2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 28.43% | -8.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 25.11% | -4.85% |
SBMAX vs. FRSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBMAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FRSGX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBMAX vs. FRSGX - Dividend Comparison
SBMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than FRSGX's 7.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRSGX Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | 7.63% | 8.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.80% | 41.15% | 8.84% | 18.91% | 14.01% | 8.78% | 6.68% | 9.71% |
SBMAX ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund | 8.60% | 8.92% | 8.73% | 1.83% | 4.96% | 12.79% | 7.27% | 7.78% | 4.52% | 6.52% | 1.70% | 5.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBMAX and FRSGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRSGX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to SBMAX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBMAX dropped -52.41% vs FRSGX's -69.07%.
SBMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBMAX and FRSGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer