WAMFX vs. GTSGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX).
WAMFX is managed by Boston Trust Walden. It was launched on Aug 1, 2011. GTSGX is managed by Madison Funds. It was launched on Jul 21, 1983.
Performance
WAMFX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WAMFX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund | -4.10% | 4.82% | 10.39% | 13.90% | -10.87% | 24.85% | 9.56% | 36.98% | -3.59% | 16.21% |
GTSGX Madison Mid Cap Fund | -6.46% | 1.62% | 10.24% | 26.51% | -13.60% | 26.31% | 9.45% | 33.53% | -1.60% | 15.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAMFX achieves a -4.10% return, which is significantly higher than GTSGX's -6.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WAMFX having a 9.70% annualized return and GTSGX not far ahead at 9.90%.
WAMFX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- 1.76%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
GTSGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- -6.46%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -0.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WAMFX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAMFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WAMFX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank
WAMFX
GTSGX
WAMFX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WAMFX | GTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | -0.02 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 0.12 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.01 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | -0.17 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | -0.50 | +0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WAMFX | GTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | -0.02 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.38 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.55 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.14 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between WAMFX and GTSGX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WAMFX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison
WAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than GTSGX's 3.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund | 7.54% | 7.23% | 3.49% | 4.84% | 5.55% | 4.82% | 3.87% | 12.83% | 7.08% | 0.45% | 5.06% | 5.54% |
GTSGX Madison Mid Cap Fund | 3.60% | 3.37% | 5.76% | 1.25% | 1.96% | 4.38% | 3.43% | 3.74% | 7.57% | 3.58% | 4.34% | 6.09% |
Drawdowns
WAMFX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAMFX drawdown since its inception was -36.81%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMFX and GTSGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAMFX | GTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.81% | -73.82% | +37.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.66% | -11.99% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.82% | -21.94% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.81% | -38.25% | +1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.38% | -11.99% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -29.79% | +25.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 4.02% | -1.08% |
Volatility
WAMFX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) is 3.29%, while Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that WAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WAMFX | GTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 3.88% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 9.91% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 18.95% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 17.33% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 18.00% | -0.52% |