SBMAX vs. VO
SBMAX (ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SBMAX returned 8.47%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for VO. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SBMAX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
SBMAX vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBMAX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SBMAX has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 8.47%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.
SBMAX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
VO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
SBMAX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBMAX ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund | 3.76% | 4.21% | 9.79% | 13.51% | -25.19% | 28.37% | 16.25% | 32.77% | -12.92% | 12.69% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.36% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBMAX and VO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SBMAX and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBMAX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
SBMAX
VO
SBMAX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBMAX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 2.18 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | 8.21 | -5.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBMAX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBMAX drawdown since its inception was -52.41%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBMAX and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBMAX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.41% | -58.87% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -8.17% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -19.02% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.55% | -27.57% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.88% | -39.37% | -0.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -1.29% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -7.85% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.16% | +1.30% |
Volatility
SBMAX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX) is 3.63%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that SBMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBMAX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.46% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 9.84% | +1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 12.81% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 17.66% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 18.93% | +1.33% |
SBMAX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBMAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBMAX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
SBMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBMAX ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund | 8.60% | 8.92% | 8.73% | 1.83% | 4.96% | 12.79% | 7.27% | 7.78% | 4.52% | 6.52% | 1.70% | 5.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SBMAX and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VO has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to SBMAX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBMAX dropped -52.41% vs VO's -58.87%.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBMAX and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer