PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBLK vs. FLRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBLK vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 45.28% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SBLK has outperformed FLRT with an annualized return of 32.55%, while FLRT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.90% annualized return.


SBLK

1D
1.73%
1M
4.11%
YTD
45.28%
6M
47.82%
1Y
70.08%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
32.55%

FLRT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.89%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
4.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBLK vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
45.28%30.76%-21.04%19.24%8.50%185.15%-24.77%29.82%-18.83%120.35%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
1.81%6.24%9.18%14.59%-2.72%3.18%2.78%9.44%-1.14%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SBLK and FLRT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBLK vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBLK
SBLK Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SBLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SBLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBLK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRT
FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBLK vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBLKFLRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.82

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

3.13

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

11.44

-0.29

SBLK vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is lower than the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBLK and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBLK vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and FLRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBLKFLRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.76%

-20.96%

-78.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-1.78%

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.44%

-2.87%

-45.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.44%

-7.60%

-40.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.77%

-20.96%

-52.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.44%

-0.17%

-93.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.70%

-1.41%

-81.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

0.49%

+5.81%

Volatility

SBLK vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.42%. This indicates that SBLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBLKFLRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

0.42%

+8.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.94%

1.23%

+21.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.65%

1.59%

+28.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.86%

2.30%

+40.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.44%

6.12%

+46.32%

Dividends

SBLK vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than FLRT's 6.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
6.81%6.93%7.93%8.40%5.81%3.16%3.52%4.30%3.95%3.20%3.38%3.21%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
3.82%1.56%16.72%7.38%33.80%9.93%0.57%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBLK and FLRT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBLK has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FLRT (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBLK dropped -99.76% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBLK and FLRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer