PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIT vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBIT vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 37.02% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return.


SBIT

1D
5.42%
1M
46.58%
YTD
37.02%
6M
52.37%
1Y
68.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SQQQ

1D
0.76%
1M
-26.37%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-42.79%
1Y
-65.16%
3Y*
-56.19%
5Y*
-49.17%
10Y*
-56.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIT vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
37.02%-25.11%-73.13%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-45.27%-53.05%-37.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIT and SQQQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBIT vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIT vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBITSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.72

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.99

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.76

-1.82

+4.59

SBIT vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIT and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBITSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

-1.37

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

-0.88

+0.41

Drawdowns

SBIT vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBITSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.35%

-100.00%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.94%

-65.95%

+18.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.26%

-100.00%

+21.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.55%

-92.40%

+23.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.69%

35.73%

-11.04%

Volatility

SBIT vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a higher volatility of 18.22% compared to ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) at 13.75%. This indicates that SBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBITSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.22%

13.75%

+4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.46%

36.45%

+32.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.18%

47.79%

+39.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.47%

66.64%

+30.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.47%

66.11%

+31.36%

SBIT vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SBIT and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SBIT vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than SQQQ's 12.48% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.42%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.48%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBIT and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to SQQQ (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIT dropped -91.35% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 68.00% vs -65.16% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 68.00% return vs -65.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIT and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 3.42% for SBIT.

SBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBIT and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer