PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIO vs. PSCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBIO vs. PSCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIO achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than PSCH's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SBIO has outperformed PSCH with an annualized return of 8.02%, while PSCH has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.


SBIO

1D
1.41%
1M
-7.56%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
3.05%
1Y
65.41%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
8.02%

PSCH

1D
1.28%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
1.80%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
-5.72%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIO vs. PSCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBIO
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
-0.39%55.07%3.81%8.68%-28.08%-17.55%21.17%50.30%-11.81%45.67%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
1.80%-0.49%3.77%-2.71%-25.15%5.75%31.47%20.17%9.15%34.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIO and PSCH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.75

The correlation between SBIO and PSCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

SBIO vs. PSCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SBIO
PSCH

Healthcare

100.0%
97.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

-0.0%
1.1%

Healthcare

SBIO
100.0%
PSCH
97.3%

Basic Materials

SBIO

-

PSCH

-

Communication Services

SBIO

-

PSCH

-

Consumer Cyclical

SBIO

-

PSCH

-

Consumer Defensive

SBIO

-

PSCH

-

Energy

SBIO

-

PSCH

-

Industrials

SBIO

-

PSCH
0.7%

Real Estate

SBIO

-

PSCH

-

Technology

SBIO

-

PSCH
1.7%

Utilities

SBIO

-

PSCH

-

Financial Services

SBIO
-0.0%
PSCH
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBIO vs. PSCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIO
SBIO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SBIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCH
PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIO vs. PSCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBIOPSCHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.10

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

0.67

+4.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.57

1.84

+13.73

SBIO vs. PSCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the PSCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIO and PSCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBIOPSCHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

0.51

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.25

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.29

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.51

-0.30

Drawdowns

SBIO vs. PSCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIO drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than PSCH's maximum drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIO and PSCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBIOPSCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.06%

-46.32%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-15.36%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.44%

-22.98%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.10%

-46.32%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.06%

-46.32%

-16.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.79%

-30.59%

+13.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.45%

-13.46%

-14.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

5.54%

-1.32%

Volatility

SBIO vs. PSCH - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) at 4.19%. This indicates that SBIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBIOPSCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

4.19%

+5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.70%

14.06%

+8.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.42%

20.26%

+9.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.56%

22.89%

+10.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.17%

23.63%

+9.54%

SBIO vs. PSCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCH's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBIO vs. PSCH - Dividend Comparison

SBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
0.01%0.04%0.27%0.01%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%
SBIO
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
0.00%0.00%3.55%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%2.79%1.77%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBIO and PSCH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIO has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to PSCH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIO dropped -63.06% vs PSCH's -46.32%.

On 10-year performance, SBIO leads with 8.02% vs 6.81% for PSCH. On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCH has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SBIO has performed better with a 8.02% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SBIO.

PSCH has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for SBIO.

SBIO tracks S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index, while PSCH tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SBIO and 0.29% for PSCH.

SBIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBIO and PSCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer