SBIL vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SBIL (Simplify Government Money Market ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIL is a Money Market fund actively managed by Simplify, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

SBIL vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 8.83% return.

SBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.69%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIL vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	1.68%	1.88%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	8.83%	6.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIL and FFUT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

SBIL vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIL vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBIL	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.40	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.55	—

Drawdowns

SBIL vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBIL	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-4.33%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.33%	+4.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-0.96%	+0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBIL	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27%	11.22%	-10.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.27%	11.02%	-10.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.27%	11.02%	-10.75%

SBIL vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBIL vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than FFUT's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.92%	2.09%
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	3.25%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBIL and FFUT in my portfolio?

SBIL and FFUT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBIL or FFUT?

On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBIL or FFUT?

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBIL or FFUT?

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.92% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between SBIL and FFUT?

SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.80% for FFUT.