SBHVX vs. FSOPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX).
SBHVX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. FSOPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 22, 2007.
Performance
SBHVX vs. FSOPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBHVX vs. FSOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 5.47% | 12.27% | 12.31% | 11.97% | -14.66% | 16.61% | 6.22% | 24.65% | -4.54% | 10.92% |
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 5.73% | 15.81% | 15.31% | 20.38% | -17.82% | 23.39% | 17.03% | 29.92% | -8.12% | 11.10% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SBHVX having a 5.47% return and FSOPX slightly higher at 5.73%. Over the past 10 years, SBHVX has underperformed FSOPX with an annualized return of 9.58%, while FSOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.
SBHVX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
FSOPX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 31.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBHVX vs. FSOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBHVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOPX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBHVX vs. FSOPX — Risk / Return Rank
SBHVX
FSOPX
SBHVX vs. FSOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBHVX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.52 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 2.18 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.48 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 10.54 | -4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBHVX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.52 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.41 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.37 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBHVX and FSOPX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBHVX vs. FSOPX - Dividend Comparison
SBHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than FSOPX's 4.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 11.04% | 11.65% | 4.61% | 1.37% | 1.25% | 4.66% | 0.95% | 6.05% | 10.28% | 6.78% | 0.22% | 5.76% |
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 4.17% | 4.41% | 9.41% | 0.98% | 5.16% | 30.85% | 2.01% | 6.67% | 13.99% | 10.31% | 0.69% | 5.93% |
Drawdowns
SBHVX vs. FSOPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBHVX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, smaller than the maximum FSOPX drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBHVX and FSOPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBHVX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -61.75% | +20.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -9.99% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -30.06% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -39.15% | -2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -5.35% | -3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -10.45% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 3.26% | +1.32% |
Volatility
SBHVX vs. FSOPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) is 7.28%, while Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that SBHVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBHVX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 7.94% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 13.58% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 22.48% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 21.69% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 21.93% | -0.67% |