PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBHVX vs. BIAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBHVX vs. BIAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBHVX achieves a 18.96% return, which is significantly higher than BIAUX's 11.88% return. Over the past 10 years, SBHVX has outperformed BIAUX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while BIAUX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.79% annualized return.


SBHVX

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.35%
YTD
18.96%
6M
21.41%
1Y
45.27%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
10.39%

BIAUX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.78%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBHVX vs. BIAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBHVX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund
18.96%12.27%12.31%11.97%-14.66%16.61%6.22%24.65%-4.54%10.92%
BIAUX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund
11.88%5.71%11.73%16.16%-8.74%31.11%-5.69%29.85%-13.48%12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SBHVX and BIAUX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.93

The correlation between SBHVX and BIAUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBHVX vs. BIAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBHVX
SBHVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SBHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SBHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAUX
BIAUX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BIAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBHVX vs. BIAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBHVXBIAUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

1.74

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

2.58

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.48

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.17

10.15

+2.02

SBHVX vs. BIAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBHVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the BIAUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBHVX and BIAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBHVXBIAUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.74

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.38

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.46

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Drawdowns

SBHVX vs. BIAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBHVX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, smaller than the maximum BIAUX drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBHVX and BIAUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBHVXBIAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.54%

-45.55%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-8.22%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.43%

-25.16%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.43%

-25.16%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

-45.55%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-1.59%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-6.19%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

2.82%

+0.76%

Volatility

SBHVX vs. BIAUX - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) at 4.23%. This indicates that SBHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBHVXBIAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

4.23%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

11.19%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.15%

17.02%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

19.78%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

21.56%

-0.27%

SBHVX vs. BIAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBHVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAUX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBHVX vs. BIAUX - Dividend Comparison

SBHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, less than BIAUX's 12.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAUX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund
12.05%13.49%16.54%5.94%6.16%0.48%0.47%9.38%14.31%4.11%0.34%2.41%
SBHVX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund
9.79%11.65%4.61%1.37%1.25%4.66%0.95%6.05%10.28%6.78%0.22%5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SBHVX and BIAUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SBHVX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to BIAUX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBHVX dropped -41.54% vs BIAUX's -45.55%.

SBHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBHVX and BIAUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer