PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFM vs. ASTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBFM vs. ASTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sunshine Biopharma Inc (SBFM) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFM achieves a -83.33% return, which is significantly lower than ASTS's 0.77% return.


SBFM

1D
-3.76%
1M
-57.41%
YTD
-83.33%
6M
-85.14%
1Y
-85.76%
3Y*
-94.10%
5Y*
-77.19%
10Y*
-51.42%

ASTS

1D
-9.26%
1M
-30.86%
YTD
0.77%
6M
-15.37%
1Y
59.32%
3Y*
120.25%
5Y*
50.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBFM vs. ASTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SBFM
Sunshine Biopharma Inc
-83.33%-59.00%-99.45%-57.58%994.95%-51.29%
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
0.77%244.22%249.92%25.10%-39.29%-31.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFM and ASTS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBFM:

$8.52M

ASTS:

$21.28B

EPS

SBFM:

-$1.98

ASTS:

-$1.84

PS Ratio

SBFM:

0.17

ASTS:

228.68

PB Ratio

SBFM:

0.37

ASTS:

8.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBFM:

$36.31M

ASTS:

$84.94M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBFM:

$12.26M

ASTS:

-$22.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

SBFM:

-$5.62M

ASTS:

-$536.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFM vs. ASTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBFM
SBFM Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SBFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFM Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFM Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ASTS
ASTS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ASTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASTS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ASTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASTS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBFM vs. ASTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sunshine Biopharma Inc (SBFM) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFMASTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.17

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

1.25

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.98

2.38

-4.36

SBFM vs. ASTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFM Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the ASTS Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFM and ASTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFM vs. ASTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFM drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than ASTS's maximum drawdown of -85.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFM and ASTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFMASTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-85.57%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-90.68%

-47.69%

-42.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.98%

-70.66%

-29.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-85.57%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-45.01%

-54.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.84%

-40.50%

-48.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.21%

25.02%

+18.19%

Volatility

SBFM vs. ASTS - Volatility Comparison

Sunshine Biopharma Inc (SBFM) has a higher volatility of 56.48% compared to AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) at 42.16%. This indicates that SBFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFMASTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

56.48%

42.16%

+14.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

117.37%

83.93%

+33.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.50%

106.17%

+23.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6,611.20%

109.65%

+6,501.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4,763.88%

110.98%

+4,652.90%

Dividends

SBFM vs. ASTS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBFM nor ASTS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SBFM vs. ASTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sunshine Biopharma Inc and AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M20222023202420252026
8.58M
14.74M
(SBFM) Total Revenue
(ASTS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SBFM and ASTS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBFM has higher volatility (56.48%) compared to ASTS (42.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFM dropped -100.00% vs ASTS's -85.57%.

ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFM and ASTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer