PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFM vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBFM vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sunshine Biopharma Inc (SBFM) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFM achieves a -83.01% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFM has underperformed KO with an annualized return of -51.26%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.


SBFM

1D
-2.34%
1M
-5.86%
6M
-84.29%
YTD
-83.01%
1Y
-86.43%
3Y*
-94.06%
5Y*
-76.38%
10Y*
-51.26%

KO

1D
1.04%
1M
1.71%
6M
19.99%
YTD
21.02%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBFM vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFM
Sunshine Biopharma Inc
-83.01%-59.00%-99.45%-57.58%994.95%272.29%3,388.89%-97.19%-93.28%197.50%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
21.02%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFM and KO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2009

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBFM:

$1.05M

KO:

$359.21B

EPS

SBFM:

-$1.36

KO:

$3.18

PS Ratio

SBFM:

0.25

KO:

7.31

PB Ratio

SBFM:

0.38

KO:

10.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBFM:

$36.31M

KO:

$49.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBFM:

$12.26M

KO:

$30.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

SBFM:

-$5.62M

KO:

$18.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFM vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBFM
SBFM Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SBFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFM Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFM Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBFM vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sunshine Biopharma Inc (SBFM) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFMKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.24

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

2.94

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.82

6.43

-8.25

SBFM vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFM Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFM and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFM vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFM drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFM and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFMKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-68.23%

-31.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-90.73%

-7.87%

-82.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.98%

-16.26%

-83.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-17.27%

-82.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

-36.99%

-63.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-0.77%

-99.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.87%

-16.07%

-72.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.70%

3.59%

+44.11%

Volatility

SBFM vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Sunshine Biopharma Inc (SBFM) has a higher volatility of 19.21% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.59%. This indicates that SBFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFMKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.21%

6.59%

+12.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

117.34%

13.54%

+103.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

128.30%

17.27%

+111.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6,608.56%

16.32%

+6,592.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4,761.94%

18.29%

+4,743.65%

Dividends

SBFM vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

SBFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.49%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%
SBFM
Sunshine Biopharma Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SBFM vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sunshine Biopharma Inc and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
8.58M
12.47B
(SBFM) Total Revenue
(KO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SBFM vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sunshine Biopharma Inc and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
35.3%
63.0%
Portfolio components
SBFM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sunshine Biopharma Inc reported a gross profit of 3.03M and revenue of 8.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.3%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

SBFM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sunshine Biopharma Inc reported an operating income of -1.79M and revenue of 8.58M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.9%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

SBFM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sunshine Biopharma Inc reported a net income of -2.14M and revenue of 8.58M, resulting in a net margin of -25.0%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SBFM and KO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBFM has higher volatility (19.21%) compared to KO (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFM dropped -100.00% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFM and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer