PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFCX vs. MCIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBFCX vs. MCIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) and Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFCX achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than MCIFX's 10.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFCX has outperformed MCIFX with an annualized return of 7.22%, while MCIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.63% annualized return.


SBFCX

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.95%
6M
3.13%
YTD
3.98%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
6.69%

MCIFX

1D
0.37%
1M
0.66%
6M
6.97%
YTD
10.02%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
7.81%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
5.63%
ALL TIME*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SBFCX vs. MCIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFCX
Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A
3.98%5.07%9.48%7.98%-11.63%10.90%11.35%19.84%-0.44%18.47%
MCIFX
Miller Convertible Bond Fund
10.02%6.35%5.75%6.06%-10.55%4.40%19.61%13.28%-5.64%7.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFCX and MCIFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

0.80

The correlation between SBFCX and MCIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFCX vs. MCIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBFCX
SBFCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SBFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

MCIFX
MCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBFCX vs. MCIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) and Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFCXMCIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.54

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.28

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.28

13.45

-9.17

SBFCX vs. MCIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the MCIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFCX and MCIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFCX vs. MCIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFCX drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, which is greater than MCIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFCX and MCIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFCXMCIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.88%

-29.19%

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-4.53%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.68%

-6.35%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.06%

-14.75%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.79%

-17.36%

-6.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-0.36%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-3.85%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.10%

+0.15%

Volatility

SBFCX vs. MCIFX - Volatility Comparison

Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX) at 1.43%. This indicates that SBFCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFCXMCIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

1.43%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

4.20%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.42%

5.38%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.22%

6.12%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.52%

6.96%

+2.56%

SBFCX vs. MCIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBFCX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MCIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBFCX vs. MCIFX - Dividend Comparison

SBFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than MCIFX's 5.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCIFX
Miller Convertible Bond Fund
5.01%4.10%4.12%3.55%3.99%7.69%3.43%2.96%5.31%5.59%2.45%2.46%
SBFCX
Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A
3.12%4.35%1.87%2.84%2.19%9.86%4.88%4.94%5.66%3.13%1.38%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBFCX and MCIFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBFCX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to MCIFX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFCX dropped -47.88% vs MCIFX's -29.19%.

MCIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFCX and MCIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer