MCIFX vs. LOCFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MCIFX (Miller Convertible Bond Fund) and LOCFX (Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MCIFX returned 3.29%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for LOCFX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCIFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for LOCFX.

Performance

MCIFX vs. LOCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCIFX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than LOCFX's 21.41% return.

MCIFX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 7.80%
• 6M: 8.09%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 5.75%

LOCFX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 21.41%
• 6M: 22.18%
• 1Y: 41.83%
• 3Y*: 21.16%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCIFX vs. LOCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCIFX Miller Convertible Bond Fund	7.80%	6.35%	5.75%	6.06%	-10.55%	4.40%	19.61%	13.28%	-5.64%	5.86%
LOCFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3	21.41%	22.43%	14.00%	7.30%	-23.12%	1.40%	64.47%	25.07%	-6.42%	10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MCIFX and LOCFX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2017	0.73

The correlation between MCIFX and LOCFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MCIFX vs. LOCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCIFX

MCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 81
MCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

LOCFX

LOCFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
LOCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
LOCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LOCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LOCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LOCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCIFX vs. LOCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCIFX	LOCFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	2.90	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.46	3.77	+0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.50	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	6.10	-2.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.68	22.88	-9.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCIFX vs. LOCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the LOCFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCIFX and LOCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCIFX	LOCFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	2.90	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.55	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.91	-0.14

Drawdowns

MCIFX vs. LOCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, smaller than the maximum LOCFX drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCIFX and LOCFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCIFX	LOCFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.19%	-33.29%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.53%	-7.02%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.35%	-12.09%	+5.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.75%	-30.60%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-11.22%	+7.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.87%	-0.78%

Volatility

MCIFX vs. LOCFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX) is 2.04%, while Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that MCIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCIFX	LOCFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	5.37%	-3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.95%	12.16%	-8.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.18%	14.71%	-9.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.13%	12.96%	-6.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.98%	14.01%	-7.03%

MCIFX vs. LOCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LOCFX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCIFX vs. LOCFX - Dividend Comparison

MCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than LOCFX's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LOCFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3	1.27%	1.86%	2.29%	2.06%	2.72%	18.36%	16.20%	8.75%	5.02%	2.08%	0.00%	0.00%
MCIFX Miller Convertible Bond Fund	4.51%	4.10%	4.12%	3.55%	3.99%	7.69%	3.43%	2.96%	5.31%	5.59%	2.45%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCIFX and LOCFX in my portfolio?

MCIFX and LOCFX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCIFX or LOCFX?

LOCFX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to MCIFX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCIFX dropped -29.19% vs LOCFX's -33.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.