PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYFIX vs. RMBKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYFIX vs. RMBKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYFIX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than RMBKX's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RYFIX has underperformed RMBKX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while RMBKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.


RYFIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
2.15%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
10.29%

RMBKX

1D
0.49%
1M
4.32%
YTD
12.74%
6M
10.66%
1Y
38.99%
3Y*
21.84%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYFIX vs. RMBKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYFIX
Rydex Financial Services Fund
0.06%11.21%22.86%14.54%-18.03%35.83%0.27%28.32%-12.05%15.74%
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
12.74%12.84%17.07%4.56%-19.18%56.40%-5.73%22.82%-17.13%12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RYFIX and RMBKX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.78

The correlation between RYFIX and RMBKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYFIX vs. RMBKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYFIX
RYFIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
RYFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
RYFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

RMBKX
RMBKX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RMBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYFIX vs. RMBKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYFIXRMBKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.34

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

4.16

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

11.11

-9.51

RYFIX vs. RMBKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the RMBKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYFIX and RMBKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYFIX vs. RMBKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYFIX drawdown since its inception was -77.63%, which is greater than RMBKX's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYFIX and RMBKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYFIXRMBKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.63%

-55.45%

-22.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-9.48%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-24.98%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.08%

-44.33%

+17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.01%

-55.45%

+11.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-1.90%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-11.04%

-7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

3.54%

+1.06%

Volatility

RYFIX vs. RMBKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX) is 4.35%, while RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that RYFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMBKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYFIXRMBKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

5.35%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

13.74%

-2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.21%

20.63%

-6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

24.82%

-6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.00%

27.17%

-6.17%

RYFIX vs. RMBKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYFIX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBKX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYFIX vs. RMBKX - Dividend Comparison

RYFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than RMBKX's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
5.52%6.22%1.90%1.29%17.29%1.35%0.00%0.85%5.39%6.63%1.50%0.00%
RYFIX
Rydex Financial Services Fund
1.21%1.21%0.76%0.00%25.45%0.83%0.00%0.41%5.14%0.51%0.71%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYFIX and RMBKX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMBKX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to RYFIX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYFIX dropped -77.63% vs RMBKX's -55.45%.

RMBKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYFIX and RMBKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer