RYFIX vs. FLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC).
RYFIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 2, 1998. FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003.
Performance
RYFIX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYFIX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYFIX Rydex Financial Services Fund | -10.06% | 11.21% | 22.86% | 14.54% | -18.03% | 35.83% | 0.27% | 28.32% | -12.05% | 15.74% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYFIX achieves a -10.06% return, which is significantly lower than FLC's -3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RYFIX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 9.27%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.
RYFIX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- -10.06%
- 6M
- -10.03%
- 1Y
- -0.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYFIX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYFIX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYFIX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
RYFIX
FLC
RYFIX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYFIX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | 0.55 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.17 | 0.75 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.14 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 0.70 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 2.71 | -2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYFIX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 0.55 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | -0.04 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.24 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.28 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYFIX and FLC is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RYFIX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
RYFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than FLC's 7.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYFIX Rydex Financial Services Fund | 1.34% | 1.21% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 25.45% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 5.14% | 0.51% | 0.71% | 1.65% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
Drawdowns
RYFIX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYFIX drawdown since its inception was -77.63%, roughly equal to the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYFIX and FLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYFIX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.63% | -76.79% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -8.69% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.08% | -40.14% | +13.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.01% | -55.27% | +11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.76% | -6.77% | -5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -10.92% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 2.26% | +2.04% |
Volatility
RYFIX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) have volatilities of 4.32% and 4.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYFIX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 4.25% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.70% | 5.78% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 11.34% | +7.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 14.23% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 22.06% | -1.08% |