PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFAX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBFAX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFAX achieves a -6.92% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFAX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 8.00%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


SBFAX

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-6.92%
6M
-4.93%
1Y
-3.26%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
8.00%

ASFYX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.36%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.47%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBFAX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFAX
1919 Financial Services Fund
-6.92%4.29%24.86%1.50%-13.99%30.74%0.14%29.11%-14.94%14.65%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFAX and ASFYX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

0.12

The correlation between SBFAX and ASFYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFAX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBFAX
SBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBFAX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBFAXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.40

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

5.08

-5.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

18.34

-19.21

SBFAX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFAX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBFAXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

2.27

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.21

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.23

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.35

+0.05

Drawdowns

SBFAX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFAX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFAX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFAXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-36.43%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-5.24%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-30.32%

+13.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.94%

-36.43%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.58%

-36.43%

-7.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-18.22%

+8.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-13.18%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

1.45%

+3.31%

Volatility

SBFAX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) have volatilities of 3.58% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFAXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.66%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

9.52%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

11.76%

+2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

13.76%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

12.71%

+10.11%

SBFAX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBFAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBFAX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

SBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.59%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
SBFAX
1919 Financial Services Fund
15.59%14.51%10.60%10.93%2.40%4.83%5.09%3.84%1.58%0.00%2.93%7.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBFAX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASFYX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to SBFAX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFAX dropped -49.33% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

ASFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFAX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer