PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBBAX vs. TIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBBAX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund (SBBAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBBAX achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 17.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SBBAX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 7.39%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


SBBAX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.98%
YTD
7.07%
6M
7.47%
1Y
17.18%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
7.39%

TIBIX

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.31%
YTD
17.02%
6M
20.55%
1Y
38.02%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.23%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBBAX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBBAX
Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund
7.07%13.05%11.27%13.04%-13.64%10.14%9.31%16.76%-5.14%12.46%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
17.02%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SBBAX and TIBIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2003

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between SBBAX and TIBIX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBBAX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBBAX
SBBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SBBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SBBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBBAX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund (SBBAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBBAXTIBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.91

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

7.15

-4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

27.88

-15.50

SBBAX vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBBAX and TIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBBAXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

4.54

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.46

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.94

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.76

-0.13

Drawdowns

SBBAX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBBAX and TIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBBAXTIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.56%

-48.88%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.12%

-5.39%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.77%

-9.23%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

-20.79%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

-34.85%

+12.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.80%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-5.96%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

1.38%

-0.01%

Volatility

SBBAX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund (SBBAX) is 2.36%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that SBBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBBAXTIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

3.12%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

6.99%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

8.49%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.97%

11.16%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.72%

13.50%

-3.78%

SBBAX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBBAX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBBAX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

SBBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, more than TIBIX's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBBAX
Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund
9.34%10.00%3.33%3.74%7.40%6.38%4.50%5.33%5.88%8.34%4.09%6.85%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.07%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBBAX and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBIX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to SBBAX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBBAX dropped -39.56% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBBAX and TIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer