SBBAX vs. SHAPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SBBAX (Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund) and SHAPX (ClearBridge Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - SBBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while SHAPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, SBBAX returned 7.04%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for SHAPX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SBBAX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for SHAPX.

Performance

SBBAX vs. SHAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund (SBBAX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SBBAX having a 5.79% return and SHAPX slightly higher at 5.87%. Over the past 10 years, SBBAX has underperformed SHAPX with an annualized return of 7.04%, while SHAPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.90% annualized return.

SBBAX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -0.47%
• 6M: 4.12%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 1Y: 13.07%
• 3Y*: 11.06%
• 5Y*: 5.77%
• 10Y*: 7.04%
• ALL TIME*: 5.92%

SHAPX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 3.63%
• YTD: 5.87%
• 1Y: 12.65%
• 3Y*: 15.46%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: 12.90%
• ALL TIME*: 12.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SBBAX Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SBBAX vs. SHAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBBAX Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund	5.79%	13.05%	11.27%	13.04%	-13.64%	10.14%	9.31%	16.76%	-5.14%	12.46%
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund	5.87%	14.32%	22.37%	19.50%	-12.56%	23.52%	14.53%	29.84%	-2.19%	18.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SBBAX and SHAPX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997	0.89

The correlation between SBBAX and SHAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SBBAX vs. SHAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBBAX

SBBAX Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SBBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SBBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SBBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SBBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SHAPX

SHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 32
SHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBBAX vs. SHAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund (SBBAX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBBAX	SHAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	0.99	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	1.45	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.18	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	1.26	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	5.39	+2.97

SBBAX vs. SHAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the SHAPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBBAX and SHAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SBBAX vs. SHAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, smaller than the maximum SHAPX drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBBAX and SHAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBBAX	SHAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.56%	-46.19%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.12%	-8.74%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.77%	-16.15%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.29%	-20.53%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.29%	-32.21%	+9.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-1.13%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-4.76%	+0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	2.03%	-0.57%

Volatility

SBBAX vs. SHAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund (SBBAX) is 2.55%, while ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that SBBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBBAX	SHAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	2.72%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.13%	8.61%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.64%	11.10%	-2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.10%	14.92%	-4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.72%	16.73%	-7.01%

SBBAX vs. SHAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBBAX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than SHAPX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBBAX vs. SHAPX - Dividend Comparison

SBBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.42%, less than SHAPX's 13.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBBAX Franklin Multi-Asset Conservative Growth Fund	10.42%	10.00%	3.33%	3.74%	7.40%	6.38%	4.50%	5.33%	5.88%	8.34%	4.09%	6.85%
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund	13.30%	14.08%	9.00%	4.17%	8.85%	6.54%	4.13%	7.09%	6.71%	5.10%	3.29%	4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBBAX and SHAPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SBBAX and SHAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SBBAX or SHAPX?

SHAPX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to SBBAX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBBAX dropped -39.56% vs SHAPX's -46.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.