SBB vs. PLTZ
SBB (ProShares Short SmallCap600) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SBB is passively managed, while PLTZ is actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SBB charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PLTZ.
Performance
SBB vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBB achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 5.04% return.
SBB
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 6M
- -12.19%
- 1Y
- -22.27%
- 3Y*
- -10.56%
- 5Y*
- -4.83%
- 10Y*
- -11.72%
PLTZ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -15.76%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBB vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600 | -13.39% | -9.40% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 5.04% | -64.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBB and PLTZ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBB vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SBB
PLTZ
SBB vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBB | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBB | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | -0.62 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SBB vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBB drawdown since its inception was -95.75%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBB and PLTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBB | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.75% | -70.28% | -25.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.75% | -62.60% | -33.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.54% | -52.06% | -22.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | — | — |
Volatility
SBB vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBB | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 101.79% | -83.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 101.79% | -80.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 101.79% | -78.53% |
SBB vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBB vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison
SBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600 | 3.63% | 3.44% | 4.86% | 4.64% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.20% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBB and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBB is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBB is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.
SBB has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SBB and 1.29% for PLTZ.
Find the right allocation for SBB and PLTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer