SBB vs. FLYD

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

SBB (ProShares Short SmallCap600) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds - SBB tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%) while FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SBB returned -9.86%/yr vs -51.53%/yr for FLYD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SBB vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBB achieves a -16.36% return, which is significantly higher than FLYD's -23.51% return.

SBB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.94%
• 6M: -12.02%
• YTD: -16.36%
• 1Y: -20.44%
• 3Y*: -9.86%
• 5Y*: -6.32%
• 10Y*: -11.71%

FLYD

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: -6.35%
• 6M: -18.63%
• YTD: -23.51%
• 1Y: -34.13%
• 3Y*: -51.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBB vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600	-16.36%	-3.56%	-3.73%	-10.44%	-6.20%
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-23.51%	-60.42%	-54.13%	-75.14%	-46.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SBB and FLYD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	0.72

The correlation between SBB and FLYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SBB vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBB

SBB Risk / Return Rank: 2
SBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
SBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SBB Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SBB Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 5
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBB vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBB	FLYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.15	-0.45	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.55	-0.23	-1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.97	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.61	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	-1.22	-0.26

SBB vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBB Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the FLYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBB and FLYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SBB vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBB drawdown since its inception was -95.99%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBB and FLYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBB	FLYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.99%	-98.49%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.50%	-56.11%	+30.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.75%	-94.73%	+55.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.90%	-98.24%	+2.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.64%	-83.44%	+8.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.84%	27.93%	-14.09%

Volatility

SBB vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) is 4.10%, while MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a volatility of 22.03%. This indicates that SBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBB	FLYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	22.03%	-17.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.34%	63.63%	-51.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.79%	75.42%	-57.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.62%	83.58%	-61.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.23%	83.58%	-60.35%

SBB vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SBB and FLYD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SBB vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

SBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, while FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600	3.72%	3.44%	4.86%	4.64%	0.31%	0.00%	0.04%	1.20%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBB and FLYD in my portfolio?

SBB and FLYD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBB or FLYD?

FLYD has higher volatility (22.03%) compared to SBB (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBB dropped -95.99% vs FLYD's -98.49%.

Which ETF is better, SBB or FLYD?

On 3-year performance, SBB leads with -9.86% vs -51.53% for FLYD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SBB has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SBB or FLYD?

Over the 3-year period, SBB has performed better with a -9.86% return vs -51.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBB or FLYD?

SBB and FLYD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBB or FLYD?

SBB has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.00% for FLYD.

What is the main difference between SBB and FLYD?

SBB tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%), while FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and REX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.