SBASX vs. EMCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX).
SBASX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 31, 2019. EMCAX is managed by Empiric Funds. It was launched on Nov 6, 1995.
Performance
SBASX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBASX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBASX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund | 2.65% | 3.95% | 11.89% | 13.96% | -13.13% | 23.52% | 22.80% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | -0.57% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBASX achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than EMCAX's -0.57% return.
SBASX
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 16.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- —
EMCAX
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBASX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBASX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
SBASX
EMCAX
SBASX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBASX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.41 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 0.72 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 0.74 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 3.00 | +1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBASX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.41 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.12 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBASX and EMCAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBASX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
SBASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than EMCAX's 0.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBASX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund | 5.44% | 5.58% | 5.48% | 3.65% | 2.10% | 18.57% | 0.00% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% |
Drawdowns
SBASX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBASX drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBASX and EMCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBASX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.34% | -51.81% | +17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -10.15% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.56% | -30.60% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.66% | -6.22% | -2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -13.33% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 2.50% | +1.15% |
Volatility
SBASX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 5.42%. This indicates that SBASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBASX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 5.42% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 10.49% | +2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.84% | 17.50% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.70% | 18.18% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 20.21% | +2.10% |