PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBASX vs. EMCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SBASX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SBASX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
2.65%3.95%11.89%13.96%-13.13%23.52%22.80%
EMCAX
Empiric 2500 Fund
-0.57%2.37%13.89%12.43%-16.06%16.07%27.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBASX achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than EMCAX's -0.57% return.


SBASX

1D
3.15%
1M
-7.26%
YTD
2.65%
6M
5.05%
1Y
16.50%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*

EMCAX

1D
2.60%
1M
-6.15%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
6.53%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SBASX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SBASX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBASX
SBASX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SBASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SBASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBASX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCAX
EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBASX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBASXEMCAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.41

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

0.72

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.09

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

0.74

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.61

3.00

+1.61

SBASX vs. EMCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBASX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the EMCAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBASX and EMCAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBASXEMCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.41

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.12

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.44

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between SBASX and EMCAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SBASX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison

SBASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than EMCAX's 0.13% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
5.44%5.58%5.48%3.65%2.10%18.57%0.00%
EMCAX
Empiric 2500 Fund
0.13%0.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.51%7.46%

Drawdowns

SBASX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBASX drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBASX and EMCAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SBASXEMCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-51.81%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-10.15%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

-30.60%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.66%

-6.22%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-13.33%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

2.50%

+1.15%

Volatility

SBASX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 5.42%. This indicates that SBASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SBASXEMCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

5.42%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

10.49%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.84%

17.50%

+4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.70%

18.18%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

20.21%

+2.10%