PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBASX vs. WTIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBASX vs. WTIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBASX achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly higher than WTIBX's -0.17% return.


SBASX

1D
1.16%
1M
-1.73%
6M
12.88%
YTD
19.05%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.77%

WTIBX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.93%
6M
-0.52%
YTD
-0.17%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
2.02%
ALL TIME*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SBASX vs. WTIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
19.05%3.95%11.89%13.96%-13.13%23.52%22.80%0.00%
WTIBX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund
-0.17%7.38%1.99%7.47%-13.13%-0.58%8.49%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SBASX and WTIBX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.13

Over the past year, SBASX and WTIBX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBASX vs. WTIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBASX
SBASX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SBASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBASX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SBASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBASX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIBX
WTIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
WTIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBASX vs. WTIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBASXWTIBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.15

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

2.94

+4.23

SBASX vs. WTIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the WTIBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBASX and WTIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBASX vs. WTIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBASX drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, which is greater than WTIBX's maximum drawdown of -17.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBASX and WTIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBASXWTIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-17.72%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-2.97%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.56%

-4.81%

-21.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

-17.72%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-2.17%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-1.95%

-6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

1.16%

+2.14%

Volatility

SBASX vs. WTIBX - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) at 1.06%. This indicates that SBASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBASXWTIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

1.06%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

3.00%

+10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.41%

3.81%

+14.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

5.66%

+14.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

4.68%

+17.45%

SBASX vs. WTIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIBX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBASX vs. WTIBX - Dividend Comparison

SBASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than WTIBX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
4.69%5.58%5.48%3.65%2.10%18.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTIBX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund
4.19%4.11%4.04%3.66%3.23%3.08%3.95%3.95%3.55%3.50%3.43%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBASX and WTIBX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBASX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to WTIBX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBASX dropped -34.34% vs WTIBX's -17.72%.

SBASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBASX and WTIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer