PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBAR vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBAR vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBAR achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.88% return.


SBAR

1D
0.35%
1M
1.78%
YTD
3.01%
6M
4.67%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.06%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBAR vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SBAR
Simplify Barrier Income ETF
3.01%13.80%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.88%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SBAR and BUCK is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.11

SBAR vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SBAR
BUCK

Financial Services

82.0%
100.0%

Technology

33.1%

-

Communication Services

10.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

9.8%

-

Industrials

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.4%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Financial Services

SBAR
82.0%
BUCK
100.0%

Technology

SBAR
33.1%
BUCK

-

Communication Services

SBAR
10.7%
BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

SBAR
10.1%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

SBAR
9.8%
BUCK

-

Industrials

SBAR
8.7%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

SBAR
5.4%
BUCK

-

Energy

SBAR
3.5%
BUCK

-

Utilities

SBAR
2.5%
BUCK

-

Real Estate

SBAR
2.0%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

SBAR
1.9%
BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBAR vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBAR
SBAR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SBAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBAR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SBAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBAR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBAR vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBARBUCKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.53

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

3.81

-1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.54

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

5.49

-2.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.33

29.09

-18.76

SBAR vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBAR and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBARBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.53

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

1.47

+0.08

Drawdowns

SBAR vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBAR drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, roughly equal to the maximum BUCK drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBAR and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBARBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-5.43%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.32%

-1.31%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-0.49%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

0.25%

+1.18%

Volatility

SBAR vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that SBAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBARBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

0.70%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

1.53%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

3.22%

+5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.81%

3.49%

+6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.81%

3.49%

+6.32%

SBAR vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBAR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBAR vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

SBAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.64%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
SBAR
Simplify Barrier Income ETF
12.64%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBAR and BUCK have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBAR has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBAR dropped -5.32% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, SBAR leads with 13.04% vs 7.91% for BUCK. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBAR has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SBAR.

SBAR has the higher dividend yield at 12.64%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

SBAR is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBAR and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBAR and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer