SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L
SAUS.L (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and MPXG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - SAUS.L tracks the MSCI Australia NR USD while MPXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SAUS.L returned 9.70%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for MPXG.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAUS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MPXG.L.
Performance
SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUS.L achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than MPXG.L's 2.07% return.
SAUS.L
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 11.26%
- 1Y
- 14.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
MPXG.L
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUS.L iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.24% | 6.23% | 3.26% | 7.65% | -0.45% |
MPXG.L Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.07% | 5.53% | 2.02% | -1.23% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAUS.L and MPXG.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, SAUS.L and MPXG.L have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAUS.L
MPXG.L
SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAUS.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.07 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.59 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 1.49 | +3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAUS.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.38 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.26 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, which is greater than MPXG.L's maximum drawdown of -16.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUS.L and MPXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAUS.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.14% | -16.94% | -21.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -7.42% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.11% | -15.75% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -6.14% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -5.30% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.87% | +0.29% |
Volatility
SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L) at 3.79%. This indicates that SAUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAUS.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 3.79% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 9.17% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 11.43% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 14.91% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 14.91% | +4.20% |
SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MPXG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAUS.L vs. MPXG.L - Dividend Comparison
SAUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MPXG.L Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.17% | 3.24% | 3.36% | 3.87% |
SAUS.L iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAUS.L and MPXG.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MPXG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MPXG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SAUS.L.
SAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while MPXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SAUS.L and 0.15% for MPXG.L.
Find the right allocation for SAUS.L and MPXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer