SAUS.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
SAUS.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SAUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia NR USD. It was launched on Jan 22, 2010. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both SAUS.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SAUS.L or CSPX.L.
Correlation
The correlation between SAUS.L and CSPX.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SAUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SAUS.L:
0.57
CSPX.L:
1.65
SAUS.L:
0.90
CSPX.L:
2.21
SAUS.L:
1.11
CSPX.L:
1.32
SAUS.L:
0.90
CSPX.L:
2.23
SAUS.L:
2.83
CSPX.L:
10.21
SAUS.L:
2.76%
CSPX.L:
2.08%
SAUS.L:
13.70%
CSPX.L:
12.89%
SAUS.L:
-38.14%
CSPX.L:
-9.49%
SAUS.L:
-4.65%
CSPX.L:
-0.61%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SAUS.L having a 2.97% return and CSPX.L slightly lower at 2.88%.
SAUS.L
2.97%
-2.47%
1.81%
8.30%
6.39%
7.05%
CSPX.L
2.88%
0.02%
9.51%
22.41%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SAUS.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SAUS.L
CSPX.L
SAUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SAUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SAUS.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SAUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -9.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUS.L and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SAUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.64%. This indicates that SAUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.