PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L).

SAUS.L and LAUU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SAUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia NR USD. It was launched on Jan 22, 2010. LAUU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia NR USD. It was launched on Mar 26, 2010. Both SAUS.L and LAUU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SAUS.L
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF		8.09%6.23%3.26%7.65%5.74%9.68%5.72%17.21%0.03%
LAUU.L
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist		6.40%9.00%3.16%6.34%2.97%9.40%8.08%16.74%-2.39%
Different Trading Currencies

SAUS.L is traded in GBp, while LAUU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LAUU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUS.L achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than LAUU.L's 6.40% return.

SAUS.L

1D
2.07%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
8.09%
6M
7.35%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
9.11%

LAUU.L

1D
2.97%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
6.40%
6M
5.71%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF

Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist

Often compared with SAUS.L:
SAUS.L vs. EWASAUS.L vs. SPYSAUS.L vs. CSPX.LSAUS.L vs. CP9G.LSAUS.L vs. XKS2.LSAUS.L vs. CNDX.LSAUS.L vs. CSKR.L
Often compared with LAUU.L:
LAUU.L vs. SPYLAUU.L vs. ^NDXLAUU.L vs. TSLYLAUU.L vs. VUSA.LLAUU.L vs. YMAXLAUU.L vs. IVVLAUU.L vs. VOO

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LAUU.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

SAUS.L
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF
LAUU.L
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist

Return for Risk

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SAUS.L
SAUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SAUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SAUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
LAUU.L
LAUU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LAUU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SAUS.LLAUU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

1.61

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.08

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.35

7.04

-0.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the LAUU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUS.L and LAUU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SAUS.LLAUU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.36

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between SAUS.L and LAUU.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L - Dividend Comparison

SAUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAUU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SAUS.L
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LAUU.L
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist		2.48%2.60%3.90%3.13%4.48%2.86%1.94%3.50%3.96%

Drawdowns

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, roughly equal to the maximum LAUU.L drawdown of -39.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUS.L and LAUU.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

SAUS.LLAUU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.14%

-45.03%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-13.62%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

-25.38%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.14%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.45%

-7.30%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-7.23%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.39%

-0.34%

Volatility

SAUS.L vs. LAUU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) is 5.48%, while Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that SAUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAUU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

SAUS.LLAUU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

6.59%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

10.63%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

17.22%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

17.07%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

20.53%

-1.36%