SAUS.L vs. EWA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA).
SAUS.L and EWA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SAUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia NR USD. It was launched on Jan 22, 2010. EWA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 1996. Both SAUS.L and EWA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SAUS.L or EWA.
Correlation
The correlation between SAUS.L and EWA is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SAUS.L vs. EWA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SAUS.L:
0.67
EWA:
0.58
SAUS.L:
1.04
EWA:
0.91
SAUS.L:
1.12
EWA:
1.11
SAUS.L:
1.06
EWA:
0.88
SAUS.L:
3.35
EWA:
2.15
SAUS.L:
2.74%
EWA:
4.47%
SAUS.L:
13.68%
EWA:
16.50%
SAUS.L:
-38.14%
EWA:
-66.98%
SAUS.L:
-3.88%
EWA:
-5.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUS.L achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than EWA's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SAUS.L has outperformed EWA with an annualized return of 7.24%, while EWA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.13% annualized return.
SAUS.L
3.81%
-1.68%
3.70%
9.58%
6.57%
7.24%
EWA
5.16%
1.17%
0.96%
10.05%
6.10%
5.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAUS.L vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SAUS.L and EWA have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SAUS.L vs. EWA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SAUS.L
EWA
SAUS.L vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SAUS.L vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison
SAUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUS.L iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 3.53% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 5.28% | 5.08% | 2.02% | 3.97% | 6.11% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 5.48% | 4.92% |
Drawdowns
SAUS.L vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, smaller than the maximum EWA drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUS.L and EWA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SAUS.L vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) is 3.66%, while iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that SAUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.