SAUS.L vs. IITU.L
SAUS.L (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SAUS.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia NR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SAUS.L returned 9.11%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAUS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUS.L achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SAUS.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 9.11%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
SAUS.L
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 15.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUS.L iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.24% | 6.23% | 3.26% | 7.65% | 5.74% | 9.68% | 5.72% | 17.21% | -6.78% | 8.05% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAUS.L and IITU.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SAUS.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAUS.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Financial Services
SAUS.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
SAUS.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SAUS.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
SAUS.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
SAUS.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
SAUS.L
IITU.L
Industrials
SAUS.L
IITU.L
Consumer Defensive
SAUS.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
SAUS.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
SAUS.L
IITU.L
-
Technology
SAUS.L
IITU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAUS.L
IITU.L
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAUS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.44 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.17 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 8.17 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAUS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.71 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 1.16 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 1.28 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.23 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUS.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAUS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.14% | -28.03% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -16.76% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.11% | -28.03% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.11% | -28.03% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.14% | -28.03% | -10.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -2.89% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -5.14% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 6.51% | -3.35% |
Volatility
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (SAUS.L) is 4.46%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that SAUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAUS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 7.01% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 14.45% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 19.60% | -6.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 21.94% | -6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 21.31% | -2.20% |
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAUS.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SAUS.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAUS.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SAUS.L.
SAUS.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SAUS.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SAUS.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer