SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SAUM.L (iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - SAUM.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAUM.L returned 10.39%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for LCUK.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAUM.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.

Performance

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly higher than LCUK.L's 5.93% return.

SAUM.L

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.64%
• YTD: 7.86%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 20.35%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: —

LCUK.L

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 6M: 5.05%
• 1Y: 16.53%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	7.86%	28.60%	4.78%	17.25%	-7.39%	14.31%	6.03%	18.94%	-3.56%
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	5.93%	21.01%	9.05%	7.25%	2.15%	18.06%	-11.83%	18.73%	-3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SAUM.L and LCUK.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018	0.76

The correlation between SAUM.L and LCUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAUM.L	LCUK.L
Financial Services	26.6%	24.2%
Technology	17.7%	0.9%
Industrials	17.1%	13.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	5.2%
Utilities	6.5%	5.1%
Healthcare	5.6%	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	13.7%
Communication Services	4.1%	3.0%
Energy	3.9%	11.1%
Basic Materials	3.7%	8.3%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.4%

Return for Risk

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUM.L

SAUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SAUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SAUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SAUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SAUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

LCUK.L

LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 38
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAUM.L	LCUK.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.38	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.92	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.25	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	1.80	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	5.79	+0.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUM.L and LCUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAUM.L	LCUK.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	1.38	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.77	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.51	+0.06

Drawdowns

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and LCUK.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAUM.L	LCUK.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-35.54%	+4.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-9.13%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.45%	-12.65%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.52%	-12.65%	-9.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-3.98%	+3.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-4.97%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	2.85%	+0.27%

Volatility

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) at 3.76%. This indicates that SAUM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAUM.L	LCUK.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	3.76%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	10.20%	+1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.82%	11.92%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	12.97%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.01%	15.69%	+3.32%

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SAUM.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SAUM.L nor LCUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	3.68%	3.05%	3.94%	3.86%	3.00%	3.48%
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAUM.L and LCUK.L in my portfolio?

SAUM.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SAUM.L or LCUK.L?

On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAUM.L or LCUK.L?

LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SAUM.L.

What is the main difference between SAUM.L and LCUK.L?

SAUM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAUM.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.