PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCUK.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCUK.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCUK.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
5.47%21.01%9.05%7.25%2.15%18.06%-11.83%18.73%-0.85%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-7.22%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%3.69%
Different Trading Currencies

LCUK.L is traded in GBP, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUK.L achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than IITU.L's -7.22% return.


LCUK.L

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
5.47%
6M
7.04%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*

IITU.L

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.22%
6M
-6.53%
1Y
35.38%
3Y*
23.98%
5Y*
18.81%
10Y*
23.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCUK.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUK.L has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LCUK.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUK.L
LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUK.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCUK.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

1.09

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.62

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.11

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.46

5.61

+3.85

LCUK.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUK.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCUK.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.09

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.86

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.09

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between LCUK.L and IITU.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LCUK.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCUK.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%3.68%3.05%3.94%3.86%3.00%3.48%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LCUK.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUK.L drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUK.L and IITU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCUK.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

-28.03%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-16.76%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.65%

-28.03%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-13.39%

+8.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-5.17%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

6.30%

-3.92%

Volatility

LCUK.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCUK.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.06%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

14.92%

-5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.20%

23.48%

-9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.90%

21.81%

-8.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

21.22%

-5.49%