PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAUG vs. KPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAUG vs. KPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUG achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than KPRO's -5.12% return.


SAUG

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.58%
YTD
7.65%
6M
7.95%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KPRO

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
-5.12%
6M
-9.44%
1Y
-1.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAUG vs. KPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SAUG and KPRO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAUG vs. KPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUG
SAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

KPRO
KPRO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
KPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUG vs. KPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAUGKPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.96

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.78

-0.16

+4.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

-0.32

+15.87

SAUG vs. KPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the KPRO Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUG and KPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAUGKPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

-0.22

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.81

+0.22

Drawdowns

SAUG vs. KPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUG drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, which is greater than KPRO's maximum drawdown of -11.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUG and KPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAUGKPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-11.92%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.10%

-11.92%

+7.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-11.91%

+11.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-2.40%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

6.01%

-4.75%

Volatility

SAUG vs. KPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) is 1.22%, while KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that SAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAUGKPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

2.71%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.41%

7.98%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.59%

8.86%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

7.83%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.81%

7.83%

+3.98%

SAUG vs. KPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than KPRO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAUG vs. KPRO - Dividend Comparison

SAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAUG and KPRO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KPRO has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to SAUG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAUG dropped -14.62% vs KPRO's -11.92%.

On 1-year performance, SAUG leads with 19.51% vs -1.92% for KPRO. On fees, SAUG is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SAUG has performed better with a 19.51% return vs -1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SAUG is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KPRO.

KPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.00% for SAUG.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SAUG and 0.95% for KPRO.

SAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAUG and KPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer